<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CodingClues - Latest Comments in Randomness</title><link>http://codingclues.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://codingclues.disqus.com/randomness/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:29:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Randomness</title><link>http://codingclues.eu/2008/randomness/#comment-3855803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've tested his PHP code and got a perfectly random bitmap, far from what he got. I'm using PHP 5 on linux.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackp</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Randomness</title><link>http://codingclues.eu/2008/randomness/#comment-3855802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure why one would plot coin-flip random result on a plot like this.  When I first saw the pic, I assumed that each point was a random pick on the plot area (in this case both x and y coordinates would be a random number from 0 to 512).  If you did this enough times, you would expect more and more of the area to be plotted.  Right?  That would seem to be a better visual representation of randomness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Randomness</title><link>http://codingclues.eu/2008/randomness/#comment-3855801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I may make a suggestion: Try plotting a 3D graph rather than a 2D graph. This will make deviations from "random" easier to see. You may be surprised at what you find. ;^)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for an excellent post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kas Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:25:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
